Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Workshop Held To Discuss Area Trails System














By Vernon Robison
Moapa Valley Progress
Published April 29, 2009
http://www.mvprogress.com/2009/17/trails

A public workshop was held on Thursday, April 23 to discuss the ongoing Open Space and Trails planning projects. There are currently two separate studies underway to plan the use of public lands and trails in and around the lower Moapa Valley community. The Open Space study, being conducted by EDAW Inc., focuses on a future network of open space and trails in the BLM Disposal Area on the eastern bench of the lower valley. A second study, the Moapa Valley Trail Study, is being led by Alta Planning and Design and focuses on a trail system within the private, developed portions of the community.

Local residents gather round to give input on a set of maps showing different concepts for a trails plan for the community. The public was invited to a workshop last week dealing with the trails and open space planning process which is currently ongoing.

At Thursday's workshop, Mike Rose of Alta Planning began by presenting findings from a recent community survey dealing with trails. "We took a User Needs survey to see what does the community want in a trails network," Rose said. The survey was conducted between January 22 and April 16 and included 121 responses received over that period by members of the public with a variety of different trail use interests, Rose said.
The survey asked what types of trails respondents were interested in seeing. Multiple answers were allowed. Walking trails were the most in demand with 75% of respondents showing interest; 66% were interested in ATV/OHV trails, 42% in bicycle trails, 33% in equestrian trails and 28% in running/jogging trails.
About 31% of those interested in walking trails stated that they currently use Moapa Valley Blvd as a place to walk. Many expressed concerns about safety on the highway where there are no sidewalks. Many expressed interest in additional bicycling trails. Of those who did, only 7% said that they bicycle on a daily basis. "This indicates that there would be a lot more cyclists if there were more trails," Rose said.
About 72% of those interested in ATV/OHV trails reported that they currently often cross Moapa Valley Blvd to access trails. Many ATV users expresed concerns about losing access to areas that they currently enjoy.
Of those responding with interest in equestrian trails, all reported owning two or more horses. About 70% of them reported that they begin their trail rides from their homes. "It is important to them to be able to keep that kind of access to the area," Rose said.
When asked what kind of amenities they would like to see on the proposed trails, Moapa Valley residents stayed with the basics. "Most of the amenities that they selected dealt with just having the trails," Rose said. This included things like trail connections, wide shoulders, regular maintenance and connections to parks. "There weren't a lot of high end amenities listed, probably because you don't have any trails right now," Rose said. "If you had trails, we might start seeing more of the higher end amenities being requested. But the message seemed to be just - we want trails!"
Rose showed a map of a preliminary concept that his group had developed for a trails plan and asked for input.
The concept began with the Muddy River Flood Channel being a linear spine down the middle of the area. From there, non-motorized trails running east and west would connect to other smaller trails and loops. "This way it would be possible for people to go for a walk from their home and take a different loop almost every day of the week," Rose said.
Further north and south, on the perimeters of the community, motorized trails went out from the central spine. A separate north-south spine for motorized use was being looked at along the railroad tracks. Rose stated that his group had contacted the railroad to discuss adopting that trail as part of the railroad right of way. The railroad officials had expressed concerns about safety and liability. But Rose said that discussions were still ongoing.
The Open Space planning portion of the meeting also focused on trails. Representatives from EDAW presented an initial concept that was also proposed for trails in the BLM disposal area. This included both motorized and non-motorized access to the area.
The concept had a non-motorized north-south corridor on the eastern edge of the community bordering the BLM land. This would provide a scenic alternative to the Muddy River trail in the valley below.
Motorized trails would provide and maintain access across the BLM disposal lands and connect to areas to the east beyond the disposal lands and to the west to the Logandale trails area. In addition, the concept would provide a large open OHV area northeast of the Bowman Reservoir where ATV users could ride free within that area.
The two planners stated that they are working together to ensure that the two plans can interface with each other. Additional information on the Moapa Valley Trails plan is available at http://moapavalleytrailstudy.org./http://. Information about the open space plan is available at http://www.moapavalleyopenspace.org/.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

NEXT MEETING - IMPORTANT AGENDA!!

Hello Everyone - Time Marches On

I read a tattoo on the back of an adventurous man in his 40's - he was a character for sure - who had made a small fortune in the window washing business in London. He was taking a break from kayaking in Marlborough Sound, New Zealand the message on his back read- "Time and Tide Wait for No Man". We are reaching a point in the study where decisions will be made that will not be easily reversed. This is the time for your input - in two-three months - it will be too late.

At our next public meeting at the Community Center on April 23 we will begin the process of designing a trail system that will serve as a significant basis for shaping the areas that will be preserved as open space as disposal lands are developed.

You are the stewards of your future and of future generations that will live in the valley. If you haven't been involved in the past that is OK however now is the time!

As project manager and a community supporter, I would like you to make the best use possible out of this effort. The BLM funded this study ($200,000) - this money will not be available again - you as a community have a wonderful opportunity to define your future - please take advatage of it.

Respectfully,
Dave Carlson dcarlson@co.clark.nv.us

Here is the agenda for the meeting

6:00 Welcome

6:10 Trail User Survey Results

6:30 Regional Trails Concepts and Connections
· Summary of EDAW, ALTA, and County Trails Charrette

7:00 Trails Analysis Summary for the BLM Disposal Area
· Summary of Stakeholder Comments Related to Trails
· Field Work
· Updated Map
· Trail suitability Model

7:15 Overall Trails Concept Plan for the BLM Disposal Area
· Trail Plan Objectives & Guidelines
· Trail Corridor Concepts

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Alternative Power Line Alignment: by Tony Rico


Hi Dave,

Although I don't have any official capacity to suggest additional ideas about this issue, I have attached your map with some text and graphics I added explaining another idea(s) of how to lessen the impact of new power line rights of way needed in/near Moapa Valley.

I suppose there is some resistance to my suggested alignments due to the need for and extraordinary governmental burdens of completing new Environment Impact Statements/Studies that would be required to execute my alternatives. I know there would be additional cost and time too. But, I don't believe a "path of least resistance" approach is the best planning policy for Moapa Valley. We've seen the negative impacts of what this mindset did in other areas of unincorporated of Clark County as it pertains to planning. I suggest we take our time and do it right for the long term while allowing for new growth and development of additional solar generation stations on top of Mormon Mesa.

See what Bright Source Energy is doing and has planned for Mormon Mesa:

http://brightsourceenergy.com/projects/ivanpah

This is the same type plan they have for 2,500 acres on the Mesa. I'm sure they are not going to be the last company to want to build up there. Whether or not other companies do what BrightSource does on top of Mormon Mesa I think my suggestions make sense.

Just some thoughts. Thanks for your time and work on this issue for our valley.

Respectfully,

Tony Ricco

Comment on Tony's idea: by Jeff Sommers

I have reviewed the proposed map submitted by Tony Ricco and I would like to add my input that this make sense. Let’s take some time and get this right the first time.
Thanks,
Jeff

Jeff L. Sommers, President
Coldwell Banker Wardley Real Estate
7670 W. Lake Mead, Ste.100
Las Vegas, NV 89128

Friday, April 3, 2009

Project Manager Update 4-3-09

see the map below

BLM Right-of-Ways - New Proposed Electrical Line Map

BLM Proposed Right-of-Way and New Proposed Electrical Line Map
(click on image to see larger map)



















Thursday, April 2, 2009

Valley of Fire Planning Meetings May 6-7

We recieved a request from Valley of Fire to post this announcement on our site......Here is a State Parks project that may be of interest.

Getting Started...Internet Survey
We are kicking off the planning process by posting park information,
issues and suggestions for management on the Park website:
http://www.parks.nv.gov/masterplans/status.htm


Ø On this website we have described the issues that the park is facing today and ask for input on potential management strategies, ideas and solutions.
Ø Our goal is to reach as many people as possible in the next few months; bringing together ideas from subject experts, special use groups, and community members to develop ideas on how to improve Valley of Fire State Parks’ natural, archaeological resources and recreation opportunities.
Ø In order to be financially efficient as possible, the Park is utilizing the internet to disperse and collect information for this plan as much as possible.